The most common phrase uttered when someone wants to invest
in the stock market is one of ‘how can I get high returns guaranteed with low
risk?’ (I could probably find a top Google search with something similar). To
be honest, I have probably searched this myself before attending sessions on
Efficient Market Hypotheses (EMH), learning about such things as ‘random walks’
and that investors irrational behaviour makes stocks difficult to predict for
even seasoned investors never mind the average Joe.
Those who (apparently) have….
Those who (apparently) have….
Some new investors think that there is a way to have
guaranteed returns after they see such people as Warren Buffett get a compounded
annual rate of 19.7% from 1965-2012 (luck or skill?) or Bill Miller beating the
market for 15 consecutive years, which is something we as investors could
only wish for.
Some ways to
hopefully get a better return….
Those famous words ‘Don’t put all your eggs in one basket’
(who doesn't love a cliché) could actually be the way to mitigate losses in your investment
portfolio and come out with a not so bad return (well, you hope more than the
risk free return rate of 1.44% (based on UK 10yr Gilt 9/2/16)). Spreading your portfolio
will help in reducing your risk of putting all your money in one industry. If
you had your entire portfolio in the banking sector (e.g. Barclays) when it
collapsed in 2008, you may have seen up to a 40% loss. However, if you had part
of your portfolio in banking and some in say, gold, then you would have
been able to mitigate you loss and come out with a ‘zero sum’ at worst (the win
may cancel out the loss, but at least you didn’t lose which is good, right?). I think sensible people don't invest all of their money in shares anyways, even Markowitz (the creator of modern portfolio theory) said that he puts at least 50% in 'safer' bonds.
An interesting article appeared on the FT (link here)
about China and how their reliance on Saudi Arabian oil could lead them to
become vulnerable to any instability and other factors in that region. The quote that really sums
up what I am trying to explain with portfolio theory above and ‘not putting all
your eggs in one basket’ is “it’s all about diversifying risk. It’s less about
picking winners and more about modern portfolio”.
Correlation is key when trying to spread your portfolio, you
do not want to invest in an industry that can be effected by another one as it
will mean your return may increase in one, then decrease in another ('zero-sum'). Let me
give you an example:
- The Oil and Airline industry are quite closely correlated (planes use oil; therefore airlines are heavily reliant on the oil price). Between August 2014 and January 2015 the oil price went from $97.27 to $48.36 (a considerable drop), however, American Airlines share price in the same period went from $30.78 to $55.69 (there may be other reasons of course). What I am trying to say with this example is that if you had an oil company investment that would have gone down, but an airline investment would have gone up (probably giving you a low return as the decrease cancels out the increase).
I just thought I would update you and can strengthen the argument I have put out there with an article that I read in the Telegraph. International Airlines Group (IAG) on 26th February 2016 announced that their profits have increased 64.4% based on the reduced oil prices. This has meant that their share price increased by 5.3p. This shows that these two industries are correlated and some industries are better not investing in together (by that I mean diversifying your portfolio).
ReplyDelete